[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- To: BUG-LISP at MIT-MC
- From: Alan Bawden <ALAN at MIT-MC>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 81 08:19:00 GMT
- Original-date: 12 December 1981 03:19-EST
This a bug in the GRIND/SPRINTer:
b
(LAMBDA (RETURN-17) (CLOSED) ((LAMBDA (X) (ENV RETURN-17) (SETQ X (LAMBDA (C-20 Y) (CLOSED X) (SETQ X (LAMBDA (C-21) (CLOSED Y) (C-21 Y)) C-20)) RETURN-17)) (QUOTE 1)))
(sprinter b)
(LAMBDA (RETURN-17)
(CLOSED)
((LAMBDA (X)
(ENV RETURN-17)
(
;(RETURN-17) SETQ-PREDICT
;BKPT WRNG-NO-ARGS
Now, I will admit that that happens to look like a three "argument"
SETQ, but I don't think that just because I happen to have some list
structure that LOOKS like code (but isn't) I should be treated this
way. That isn't a very comprehensible error message, and just why
does it claim to be a WRNG-NO-ARGS error? (It's not actually going to
let me return something to continue with is it?)