[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
#+ ... vs (IF-FOR-LISPM ...), etc.
- To: GJS at MIT-MC, CWH at MIT-MC
- Subject: #+ ... vs (IF-FOR-LISPM ...), etc.
- From: KMP at MIT-MC (Kent M. Pitman)
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 81 19:18:00 GMT
- Cc: (BUG LISP) at MIT-MC
- Original-date: 11 MAR 1981 1418-EST
Consider some function, f, which on LispM takes an additional arg
over what it does in Maclisp. :lmsend daniel@cadr2
yup. i have it on about 80 ...