[no subject]

[George J. Carrette <GJC at MIT-MC>]

From:     Date:
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 81 21:12:00 GMT
Original-Date: 02/17/81 17:12:00 EDT
Subject:
    From: GSB at MIT-ML
    To:   GJC at MIT-ML
    cc:   (BUG LISP) at MIT-ML

    there is no need to extend the evaluator to deal with a class-object
    in the CAR of the hunk, as the evaluator already dispatches via
    (status usrhunk).  It is the COMPILER which requires that slot to
    have a dummy macro definition (otherwise it could be something more
    general than "self-eval", eh?)

The compiler eh? Oh foobar. JONL can extend that can't he?
Certainly nobody would object if he did. (Or would they?)