[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



:L
ALLOC? N
(SETQ MSGFILES 0)
(ERROR)
.VAL 0; ...

:L
ALLOC? N
(SETQ MSGFILES 'FOO)
(ERROR)
PURPG;....

In .INFO.;LISP NEWS, bad values of MSGFILES are documented to cause an 
IO-LOSSAGE type error (after setting MSGFILES to '(T)), similar to the 
way bad BASE and IBASE values are treated with FAIL-ACT breaks. Couldn't
Lisp be coaxed to do something along the lines of what it's documented to?
-kmp