LSUBR CONS and `

[GLS at MIT-MC (Guy L. Steele, Jr.)]

    In my opinion LIST* (or LIST.  ?) is a much better name
    for that operation than CONS.
Fine by me - I just want the feature, with some standard name.
If LISPM already calls it that, it suits me.
    Note that ,@ 's only conflict with other syntax for @ is that
    you must remember not to put an @ immediately (without intervening space)
    after a comma.  This is irrelevant to whether @ is a macro character
    or an alphabetic.  I.e. comma does a tyipeek looking for an atsign.
I thought of that.  It's gritchy, but I guess one could live with
it.  Still, there could have been other choices, such as ,- , but I
guess maybe it isn't worth changing at this point?