[no subject]

[HIC@MIT-MC]

From: GSB@MIT-ML
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 78 11:11:45 GMT
Original-Date: 06/19/78 07:11:45 EDT
Subject: Re: Proposed change to ARRAYDIMS
To: HIC at MIT-MC
    From: HIC at MIT-MC (Howard I. Cannon)
    Subject: Proposed change to ARRAYDIMS
    Proposed change to ARRAYDIMS:
    Currently, ARRAYDIMS returns (T ...) for any array S-expression array,
    including those which were created with NIL.  Are there any objections to
    changing ARRAYDIMS to return NIL if the array was created with NIL as its
    type?
Interesting, i was under the impression that that was what it was supposed
to do, and did... obviously, i haven't used NIL type arrays in a while.
It certainly should return NIL as the type.