[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- To: BUG-MACLISP at MIT-MC
- From: Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 81 04:05:00 GMT
- Original-date: 25 May 1981 00:05-EDT
Is there any reason CHECK-TYPE can't do something with SETF instead of SETQ?
GJC says his generic PUSH/POP definer can make this win.