[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(FUNCALL <fsubr-frob> <any-list>)
- To: touretzky at CMU-10A
- Subject: (FUNCALL <fsubr-frob> <any-list>)
- From: JONL at MIT-MC (Jon L White)
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 79 17:10:00 GMT
- Cc: (BUG LISP) at MIT-MC
- Original-date: 9 JUL 1979 1310-EDT
We've been propogating the term "special forms" for
the use of symbols in LISP that are sort of "built-in" -
one problem with the term "fsubr" is that it leads you to
suspect that it is usable anywhere that a normal "subr"
function is. FUNCALL is only for functions - it appears to
be a deficiency of the interpreter and compiler that
FUNCALL doesn't check this. We did extend the meaning of
APPLY for "fsubrs" such that
(APPLY <fsubr-frob> <any-list>)
is to mean the same as
(EVAL (CONS <fsubr-frob> <any-list>))
and it is the shared code (between funcall and apply) that
is causing FUNCALL to miss out on checking.