"Sorry, guys ..."

[JONL at MIT-MC (Jon L White)]

CC: (BUG LISPM) at MIT-MC, (BUG LISP) at MIT-MC, H at MIT-MC

Well, poor "H" getting all that response.  Anyway, this
particlar piece of mail left one misimpression, or at least
so I think, and wonder if you concur.  The potential syntax
(DOTIMES <symbol> ...)  doesn't share the ambiguities of 
computed GOTO's, nor of the STATUS-MACRO kludge, but rather
has the same case analysis of old/new style DO.  On the
other hand, the pointer to Interlisp's RPTQ was most welcome.