"*CATCH"?

[JONL at MIT-MC (Jon L White)]

CC: (BUG LISP) at MIT-MC, (BUG LISPM) at MIT-MC

I presumed that Dan just forgot about the existence of
*CATCH in it current definition, and was trying to propose something
new.  RMS seems to have noticed this same possibililty, by suggesting
that named progs could supplant the need for anything else named.
E.g.,  (DO-NAMED GORILLA ...) ==> (PROG GORILLA () (DO ...))