[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOTIMES
- To: JONL at MIT-MC
- Subject: Re: DOTIMES
- From: MOON@MIT-MC
- Date: Sun ,4 Aug 80 03:56:10 EDT
CC: (BUG LISPM) at MIT-MC, NIL-I at MIT-MC
JONL@MIT-MC 04/08/80 17:46:39 Re: DOTIMES
To: MOON at MIT-MC
CC: (BUG LISPM) at MIT-MC
Sorry for typo - msg meant to say
"Why doesn't the LISPM version of DOTIMES support the syntax
(DOTIMES 4 (MUMBLE))
which should act like
(DOTIMES (G0025 4) (MUMBLE))
Because said syntax is a crock. It doesn't work to substitute an
expression for "4", which I don't think is an acceptable limitation,
considering how little it buys you.
Furthermore this syntax has never before been discussed (to my
knowledge anyway.) I think we can safely shelve this one with the
other bad ideas.