[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]


In system 25.0, with microcode 612, on LISP Machine Two:
When you get an undefined-function error in the evaluator, it is
EXTREMELY ANNOYING that when you type Control-R to the error
handler you are asked for a value to return from SI:*EVAL,
rather than a new function.  In general when some quantity
is in error, Control-R should take a new quantity to replace
the defective opne, and not decide to return from some arbitrary place.