[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- To: (BUG LISPM) at MIT-AI
- From: GLS at MIT-AI (Guy L. Steele, Jr.)
- Date: Wed ,6 Feb 80 18:22:00 EDT
CC: GLS at MIT-AI
In system 25.0, with microcode 612, on LISP Machine Two:
When you get an undefined-function error in the evaluator, it is
EXTREMELY ANNOYING that when you type Control-R to the error
handler you are asked for a value to return from SI:*EVAL,
rather than a new function. In general when some quantity
is in error, Control-R should take a new quantity to replace
the defective opne, and not decide to return from some arbitrary place.