[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LIST* with 0 or 1 argument
- To: Henry at MIT-AI, (BUG LISP) at MIT-AI, (BUG LISPM) at MIT-AI
- Subject: Re: LIST* with 0 or 1 argument
- From: MOON@MIT-MC
- Date: Tue ,28 Nov 79 17:49:12 EDT
I have rectified this oversight on the Lisp machine (in the source
only). I haven't tested it since there don't seem to be any Lisp machines
in the immediate vicinity out here. I also rewrote the code to make
it readable and to remove a bug. Bob, the reason the 0- and 1-argument
cases work out naturally in Maclisp and not in the Lisp machine is that
Maclisp lacks cdr-coding, allowing LIST* to be written as iterated
calling of CONS.