[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Commands redefining keys
- To: DLA at SCRC-TENEX, BUG-ZWEI at SCRC-TENEX
- Subject: Commands redefining keys
- From: David E. Goldfarb <DEG at SCRC-TENEX>
- Date: Sun ,21 Feb 82 13:46:00 EDT
- Cc: DEG at SCRC-TENEX
Date: Thursday, 18 February 1982, 22:22-EST
From: David L. Andre <DLA at SCRC-TENEX>
Date: Wednesday, 17 February 1982, 20:42-EST
From: David E. Goldfarb <DEG at SCRC-TENEX>
I object to the fact that com-list-callers takes the liberty of
defining c-. for its own purposes. I already use that key and don't
like having it pulled away from me.
Maybe it should be documented somewhere that everything redefines c-.
That is not really my point. I find c-. a convenient key for my own
uses. No key should be completed hardwired to any functionality; if it
is desirable to have a general iteration key, that key should be
selected by some global (and user-redefinable) variable, and not
restricted to be only c-..