[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]

    Date:  3 OCT 1980 1357-EDT
    From: RICH at MIT-AI (Charles Rich)
    It would be nice if
    (DEFsomething (FOO ...) ...)
    counted as a definition as FOO.  I have found lots of situations where
    this is a useful definition syntax, except that it is not currently recognized by
The problem is that sometimes that syntax defines FOO, and sometimes it
defines some other property of FOO, it used to work the way you
describe, but the current behaviour seems more satisfactory, given that
you can always typ M-. (foo and get it.