[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Completion
- To: ALR@MIT-OZ
- Subject: Re: Completion
- From: Jan Walker <JWALKER@SCRC-TENEX>
- Date: Thu ,15 Dec 83 22:50:00 EDT
- Cc: bug-zwei@OZ
- In-reply-to: The message of Thursday, 15 December 1983, 17:11-EST from Andrew L. Ressler <ALR at MIT-OZ>
- Sender: JWALKER@SCRC-TENEX
Date: Thursday, 15 December 1983, 17:11-EST
From: Andrew L. Ressler <ALR at MIT-OZ>
In ZWEI in Release 5.0 [GC'd Beta Test rev 3], dusty plum, on Lisp Machine Keith Moon (3600):
I think the following is a bug in completion. Will it ever be fixed??
On oz I have the following files:
talk-outline.press
talk-outline.text
While in ZMACS I type ctrl-x ctrl-f which shows the default of FOO.LISP
After typing TALK-<COMPLETE> it completes to
TALK-OUTLINE.LISP
If anything it should only complete to
TALK-OUTLINE.
Andrew
--------------------
The bug consists of a mismatch between your model of what
completion is (based on the TOPS-20 facility) and the Lisp
Machine model of what completion is (based on God knows
what).
"Completion" guarantees to complete to a valid file spec,
getting unspecified parts of it from the stored, usually
displayed, defaults. It has nothing at all whatsoever to
do with whether the file spec thus formed corresponds to
a file on the physical file system.
Arguments for both sides are plausible. The fact is that
what you are seeing is not a bug, but is rather how the
facility works. The fact that it is called "completion" is
unfortunate, as that misleads users who are expecting the
other model, of the same name.