[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: (BUG ZWEI) at MIT-AI
- From: rms@MIT-AI (Sent by ___021@MIT-AI)
- Date: Mon ,27 Mar 79 13:27:39 EDT
When DELETE-INTERVAL is given bps out of order and told
that they are in order, it manages to garbage the whole
buffer from there on before complaining.
If it would slow things down to check the condition before
changing anything, maybe it is possible to arrange to
be able to undo what has been done, after noticing that it has
lost and before reporting the error.