[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Procedure for Steele's proposed clarifications
- To: KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
- Subject: Re: Procedure for Steele's proposed clarifications
- From: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 30 Apr 87 14:31 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Wed, 29 Apr 87 13:08 EDT
Many of the issues that are before us occured in Steele's list of
proposed clarifications, and, even though simple at first glance, seemed
to require the full-blown form.
If there is a subset of the clarifications which we can agree on without
discussion, then I'd be happy to proceed with them; if we all agree, we
can just submit them as a set of "obvious clarifications". I'm a little
skeptical that there are many like that. Do you have some candidates in
mind?