[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SEQUENCE-FUNCTIONS-EXCLUDE-ARRAYS (Version 2)
- To: Fahlman@c.cs.cmu.edu, CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: SEQUENCE-FUNCTIONS-EXCLUDE-ARRAYS (Version 2)
- From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 87 15:59 EDT
- In-reply-to: <FAHLMAN.12299221539.BABYL@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: Sat, 2 May 1987 15:21 EDT
From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@c.cs.cmu.edu>
...
I would like to encourage KMP to go ahead with a separate proposal for
ROW-MAJOR-SUBSCRIPTS (or whatever we end up calling it). Given that, I
think a version of POSITION that returns a single number for arrays is
probably the way to go, and users can then turn this into a subscript
list if they like. I have a mild aversion to getting a list from some
function that has heretofore always returned a number or NIL.
In this instance, note that a NIL result could be confused with an
empty list of subscripts, the natural result in the case of a
zero-dimensional array.
--Guy