[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PATHNAME-SYMBOL
- To: edsel!kent-state!eb@λnavajo.stanford.edu (Eric Benson)λ
- Subject: PATHNAME-SYMBOL
- From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1987 23:37 EDT
- Cc: cl-cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: Msg of 2 Jun 1987 14:53-EDT from edsel!kent-state!eb at navajo.stanford.edu (Eric Benson)
- Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
I think you've made a better case for eliminating the coercion of
symbols to strings, rather than making a special case restriction
against using a symbol as a string to be coerced to a pathname. You
have also made a case for making the boolean falsehood value be
something other than a symbol. Making this special case restriction
against symbols as pathnames is treating the symptom and not the
disease.
Treating the symptom rather than the disease is often the best way to
keep the patient alive. Let's fix what we can and think about more
extensive redesigns later.
-- Scott