[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FORMAT-OP-C (Version 4)
- To: Masinter.pa@XEROX.COM
- Subject: FORMAT-OP-C (Version 4)
- From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1987 19:02 EDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: Msg of 5 Jun 1987 18:04-EDT from Masinter.pa at Xerox.COM
- Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
This version is OK by me except for the last paragraph of the
discussion. I think you're introducing an entirely new topic in the
offhand comment about READ-CHAR always returning one charater for every
one WRITE-CHAR has written. This might be worth a clarification of its
own, but it shouldn't be introduced here, especially as a
"clarification", which makes it sound like that interpretation is
obvious to the people who endorse FORMAT-OP-C.
Drop the last paragraph?
-- Scott