[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: GET-SETF-METHOD-ENVIRONMENT, Version 3

To: cl-cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
Subject: Issue: GET-SETF-METHOD-ENVIRONMENT, Version 3
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 87 22:59 EDT
In-reply-to: <870605-232848-2962@Xerox>

The adoption cost sentence about some implementations (Symbolics)
already using an optional argument to GET-SETF-METHOD for
something else seems to have disappeared in the latest revision.
I don't care a whole lot, but I don't think we want to cover up
any known adoption costs in proposals.

References:
- Issue: GET-SETF-METHOD-ENVIRONMENT, Version 3
  - From: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM

Prev by Date: FUNCTION-TYPE
Next by Date: Issue ADJUST-ARRAY-DISPLACEMENT
Previous by thread: Issue: GET-SETF-METHOD-ENVIRONMENT, Version 3
Next by thread: Issue: GET-SETF-METHOD-ENVIRONMENT, Version 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread