[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue ADJUST-ARRAY-DISPLACEMENT
- To: CL-CLEANUP@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Subject: Re: Issue ADJUST-ARRAY-DISPLACEMENT
- From: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 11 Jun 87 12:47 PDT
- In-reply-to: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Wed, 10 Jun 87 23:09 EDT
- In-reply-to: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>'s message of Sun, 7 Jun 87 19:29 EDT
I intend to revise and recirculate this issue before mailing to X3J13
(unless someone else volunteers to do the revision first.)
Does anyone object to specifying that ADJUST-ARRAY, if no :DISPLACED-TO
argument is given, will always result in a non-displaced array, even if
the array was displaced before?