[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: PATHNAME-STREAM (Version 4)
- To: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Subject: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-STREAM (Version 4)
- From: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 23 Oct 87 12:01 PDT
- In-reply-to: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Fri, 23 Oct 87 14:35 EDT
I'm happy to go along with allowing PATHNAME coersion to traverse
synonym streams; I don't really care as long as it is defined what it
does.
Any other opinions?