[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT (version 1)

To: Dan L. Pierson <pierson@MULTIMAX.ARPA>
Subject: Issue: DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT (version 1)
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 87 20:39 EST
Cc: cl-cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
In-reply-to: <8712072340.AA01767@multimax.ARPA>

I support DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT:DO-NOT-INSTALL as well as
KMP's suggested improvement to the test case, which I was
going to suggest myself.  The COMPILED-FUNCTION type
specifier is not well-defined and if I remember correctly
the FUNCTION-TYPE cleanup issue proposes to remove it.

References:
- Issue: DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT (version 1)
  - From: Dan L. Pierson <pierson@multimax.ARPA>

Prev by Date: Cleanup issues from Japanese technical working group
Next by Date: Re: Issue: DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT (version 1)
Previous by thread: Issue: DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT (version 1)
Next by thread: Issue: DISASSEMBLE-SIDE-EFFECT (version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread