Issue: TRACE-FUNCTION-ONLY

[masinter.pa@Xerox.COM]

My notes from our subcommittee meeting was that we wanted to handle this issue
as a "make it undefined".  However, in re-reading CLtL, I find that the language
there is perfectly adequate for handling the situation ("trace and untrace may
also accept additional implementation-dependent argument formats. The format of
the trace output is implementation-dependent.") 

I no longer have any enthusiasm for pushing on this issue. 


If anyone wants to pursue the issue in its current form, I would like to see a
discussion section saying that I think it is unnecessary.