[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS
- To: edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU
- Subject: Re: Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 23 May 88 17:56 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU>'s message of Fri, 12 Feb 88 23:31:35 PST
The issue SETF-METHOD-FOR-SYMBOLS is withdrawn, and it is probably confusing to
leave it in the references section. PUSH-EVALUATION-ORDER, however, is relevant
and in fact addresses many of the same issues; however PUSH-EVALUATION-ORDER
does not put any constraints on the GET-SETF-METHOD for functions like LDB and
GETF.
My notes from the last meeting was that this was "in discussion", but no
subsequent discussion has been held. I'd like to see this updated if only to
make it clear that the issues, while related, are not the same as
PUSH-EVALUATION-ORDER.
Nit: spell out names in Edit History, e.g.,
Edit history: Version 1 JonL White & Ken Olum 12-Feb-88
(based on SETF-METHOD-FOR-SYMBOLS)