[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: COERCE-INCOMPLETE
- To: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu, a37078%tansei.cc.u-tokyo.junet@relay.cs.net
- Subject: Re: Issue: COERCE-INCOMPLETE
- From: Dan L. Pierson <pierson@multimax.ARPA>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 88 12:01:31 EDT
While I support the idea of filling out a more complete coercion matrix for
Common Lisp, I find some of the specifics of this proposal counter-intuitive
and unpleasant. For example, I would like the following to return 5:
(COERCE "5" 'INTEGER)
I would also like the following to work and return 456:
(COERCE "456" 'INTEGER)
This proposal would require the first expression to return 53 (for ascii
implementations) and force the second expression to signal an error (I
think).