[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: STANDARD-INPUT-INITIAL-BINDING (version 6)
- To: cl-cleanup%sail.stanford.edu@multimax
- Subject: Issue: STANDARD-INPUT-INITIAL-BINDING (version 6)
- From: Dan L. Pierson <pierson%mist@multimax.ARPA>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 88 17:55:32 EDT
Issue: STANDARD-INPUT-INITIAL-BINDING
References: Standard streams (pp. 327-329)
Category: CHANGE
Edit history: Version 1 by Pierson and Haflich 1/19/87
Version 2 by Pierson 2/29/88
Version 3 by Pierson 5/23/88, per comments by Moon
Version 4 by Pierson 5/26/88, clean up
Version 5 by Pierson 6/28/88, simple design per Masinter
Version 6 by Pierson 7/ 5/88, clean up and split issue
Status: For Internal Discussion
The new inquiry functions have been split off into a new issue:
STREAM-CAPABILITIES. The proposal name has been changed back to
DEFINED-CONTRACTS to reflect this.
Problem description:
CLtL requires that *STANDARD-INPUT*, *STANDARD-OUTPUT*,
*ERROR-OUTPUT*, *TRACE-OUTPUT*, *QUERY-IO*, and *DEBUG-IO* are
initially bound to synonym streams to *TERMINAL-IO*. This requirement
hampers the integration of Common Lisp with many existing and
potential operating environments.
For example, a Unix implementation is currently unable to legally
support Unix standard error output even though Common Lisp defines
*ERROR-OUTPUT* because *ERROR-OUTPUT* is required to start out bound
to the same stream as *STANDARD-OUTPUT*. A workstation environnment
which provides stream access to windows as an extension is currently
forbidden to make trace output appear in a separate window by default
because *TRACE-OUTPUT* is required to start out bound to the same
stream as *STANDARD-OUTPUT*.
Proposal (STANDARD-INPUT-INITIAL-BINDING:DEFINED-CONTRACTS):
A Common Lisp implementation is required to provide the following
initial streams. Each initial stream has a specific purpose as
defined in CLtL. This proposal redefines the initial bindings of
the streams and leaves the rest of the CLtL description unchanged.
*TERMINAL-IO*
Is always bound to a writable two-way stream that is not a
synonym for any of the the other streams mentioned in this
proposal. It is legal for input from *TERMINAL-IO* be a
permanently empty stream because there may be no convenient
place to read input from (it is also legal for output to
*TERMINAL-IO* to go to a bit-sink; there is no portable way
for a program to detect this case).
*STANDARD-INPUT*
*STANDARD-OUTPUT*
*ERROR-OUTPUT*
*TRACE-OUTPUT*
*QUERY-IO*
*DEBUG-IO*
The initial bindings of these variables are undefined except
that:
1. They are all initially bound to streams.
2. The streams must support input and/or output as
indicated by the variable name.
3. None of the streams may be synonym-streams for another
one of the streams, whether directly or by indirection
via some composite stream type such as a two-way
stream.
4. Any or all of these streams may be synonym streams for
*TERMINAL-IO*.
5. Any or all of these streams may be synonyms for the a
common implementation dependent stream. For example,
in an interactive Common Lisp invocation running on a
character terminal, all of the streams mentioned here
might be synonym streams (or two-way streams to synonym
streams) to a pair of hidden terminal input/output
streams maintained by the implementation.
The intent of the above rules is to ensure that it is always
safe to bind any of the above variables to another of the
above variables without unduly restricting implementation
flexibility.
Test Cases/Examples:
(PROGN
(PRINT "Output" *STANDARD-OUTPUT*)
(PRINT "Error" *ERROR-OUTPUT*))
In current Common Lisp will write:
------
Output
Error
------
With proposal *might* write:
------
Output
------
and "Error" appears somewhere else.
(LET ((*STANDARD-OUTPUT* *DEBUG-IO*))
...)
In current Common Lisp:
Might cause a circular stream reference because *DEBUG-IO* was
bound to a two-way stream made up of synonym streams to
*STANDARD-INPUT* and *STANDARD-OUTPUT*.
With this proposal:
Would be guaranteed not to cause a circular stream reference.
(LET ((*STANDARD-INPUT* *TERMINAL-IO*)
(*STANDARD-OUTPUT* *TERMINAL-IO*))
...)
In current Common Lisp:
Might cause a circular stream reference because *TERMINAL-IO* was
bound to a two-way stream made up of synonym streams to
*STANDARD-INPUT* and *STANDARD-OUTPUT*.
With this proposal:
Would be guaranteed not to cause a circular stream reference.
Rationale:
This proposal attempts to provide a balance between over-specifying
behavior to the point that Lisp programs can't behave like other
programs in conventional operating systems and providing enough
specification that Common Lisp programs can perform portable input and
output.
Current practice:
Lucid binds *TERMINAL-IO* to a special internal stream type. Franz
binds *TERMINAL-IO* to a special internal stream type for terminal
streams which reads from Unix standard input and writes to Unix
standard output. KCL binds *TERMINAL-IO* to a standard two-way-stream
with input from Unix standard input and output to Unix standard
output.
Cost to Implementors:
All implementations will have to change to some degree but the changes
will probably be simple and localized. All known implementations
already support the underlying streams required to implement this
proposal.
Cost to Users:
User code which depends on the strict binding hierarchy in CLtL may
have to change.
Cost of non-Adoption:
It will continue to be difficult or impossible to integrate portable
Common Lisp progams in conventional operating system environments.
Many implementations will have to continue to choose between
conforming to the standard and providing a superior user environment.
Benefits:
Implementations will be more able to match their IO behavior to their
environment and their user's expectations.
Aesthetics:
Improved because this area becomes better defined.
Discussion:
Pitman was concerned that the initial version of this proposal didn't
provide a guaranteed way to get back the initial streams after
rebinding, e.g. *standard-io*. The second version of this proposal
offered a solution to that problem which was generally considered too
complex. This problem should now be solved.
Moon says that *TERMINAL-IO* (and, by extension, *QUERY-IO*, and
*DEBUG-IO*) should fail to work in a non-interactive environment where
nothing like a terminal exists.
Masinter notes that:
``In many multi-processing multi-window environments,
the "initial binding" for *STANDARD-INPUT*, *QUERY-INPUT*
differs for each process.''
Pitman suggests that this issue be renamed to remove "STANDARD-INPUT"
from the name. Pierson hasn't done this for fear of further confusing
people's archives.
Pierson supports STANDARD-OUTPUT-INITIAL-BINDING:DEFINED-CONTRACTS.