[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: PATHNAME-COMPONENT-CASE (Version 1)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP%STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM@multimax>
- Subject: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-COMPONENT-CASE (Version 1)
- From: Dan L. Pierson <pierson%mist@multimax.ARPA>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 88 18:38:24 EDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup%SAIL.STANFORD.EDU@multimax
- In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 21 Jul 88 17:16:00 -0400. <880721171622.0.KMP@PEWEE.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 88 17:16 EDT
From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
... Whether we go with KMP's proposal or something like my proposal 2,
I think that we should use all-lower-case to indicate canonical case,
and all-upper to indicate anti-canonical case. ...
There are already several places where this arbitrary decision has been
made in Lisp. The decision has been made consistently, and I think that's
useful. I would hate to go against the grain:
I hate to agree with Kent here because I really prefer lower case for
everything possible, but he's right. The decision to make uppercase
the default in Common Lisp was probably a mistake, but it's a mistake
we're stuck with. Inconsistency is worse.