[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RETURN-VALUES-UNSPECIFIED
- To: Masinter.pa@xerox.com
- Subject: RETURN-VALUES-UNSPECIFIED
- From: gls@Think.COM
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 88 12:31:23 EDT
- Cc: chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: Masinter.pa@xerox.com's message of 2 Sep 88 16:20 PDT <880902-162146-7401@Xerox>
Date: 2 Sep 88 16:20 PDT
From: Masinter.pa@xerox.com
I might quibble with a few of these:
INSPECT: it is marginally more useful to say that INSPECT returns the item
inspected. Some interactive inspectors might allow you to return a new value as
the value of INSPECT, e.g., (SETQ X (INSPECT X)).
I disagree. If one regards INSPECT as a tool in the interactive
interface, it can be a real nuisance to inspect some huge data structure
and then when you finish it insists on printing 300 lines of gobbledygook
at you.
--Guy