[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: PATHNAME-WILD (Version 1)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: Issue: PATHNAME-WILD (Version 1)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 8 Sep 88 15:03 PDT
- Cc: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Thu, 8 Sep 88 16:07 EDT
Why don't you add to the discussion something like
"We considered the name PATHNAME-WILD-P instead, which is favored by some
members of the cleanup committee. Precedent for both PATHNAME-WILD-P and
WILD-PATHNAME-P (and PATHNAME-WILD) can be found in Common Lisp."