[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: RANGE-OF-START-AND-END-PARAMETERS (Version 1)
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Issue: RANGE-OF-START-AND-END-PARAMETERS (Version 1)
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 88 14:28 EDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: <880914124243.1.KMP@GRYPHON.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
I approve RANGE-OF-START-AND-END-PARAMETERS:INTEGER-AND-INTEGER-NIL.
I think it would be good to mention explicitly that an end parameter
must be >= its corresponding start parameter, just to keep things
perfectly clear.