[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: NTH-VALUE
- To: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com
- Subject: Re: Issue: NTH-VALUE
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 19 Sep 88 14:43 PDT
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com's message of 12 Sep 88 16:06
My belief is that as long as there is some proponent for a proposal we are
better off submitting it with the recommendation that it not be adopted than
just dropping it. I think the mail is clear that both Kent and Dan are
interested in seeing this carried forward. I'm neutral on it, but I've had on
more than one occasion had to write
(multiple-value-bind (ignore value) (form) (declare (ignore ignore)) value)
to get what I wanted, so that this is mildly interesting to me.