Re: Issues: IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY and DEFPACKAGE

To: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
Subject: Re: Issues: IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY and DEFPACKAGE
From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: 28 Sep 88 15:06 PDT
Cc: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>'s message of Wed, 28 Sep 88 14:50:29 PDT

I like it, but it is necessary to define what "essentially compatible" means.


Please.