New Issue: SYNTACTIC-ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS

[David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>]

I agree with the general tenor of Kent's comments.  I'd like to see
an alternate version of the proposal written up that way, so we can
see the ramifications.

I also wonder about having separate accessors for scope, type, and
(for functions) inlinitude.  Would it be more or less elegant to
have a single accessor that returns all this information as multiple
values?  I'd say more elegant, although I'm not sure what happens
if the type was proclaimed but the inlinitude was declared.