[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
- To: Jim McDonald <@sail.stanford.edu:jlm@lucid.com>, gls@think.com
- Subject: Re: Issue: TEST-NOT-IF-NOT (Version 1)
- From: Jeff Dalton <jeff%aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 88 16:20:02 BST
- Cc: KMP@scrc-stony-brook.arpa, CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: Jim McDonald's message of Thu, 6 Oct 88 12:33:16 PDT
> My only complaint about this is that I use REMOVE-IF-NOT much more
> frequently than REMOVE-IF.
> --Guy
>
> Maybe we should add KEEP-IF :-)
>
> I could even get serious if we called it ABSTRACT.
How about FILTER.