Issue: DEFPACKAGE (Version 6)

[Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>]

My notes from Fairfax meeting...

X3J13 meeting:

 A straw poll was taken and there was unanimous approval of the
 concept of DEFPACKAGE, so it seems very likely this will
 ultimately pass.

 Walter: Wants to see a portable definition distributed.

 KMP: Notes that one issue is that DEFPACKGE needs to work somewhat
      differently when definitions are re-loaded than it did the
      first time. That issue would show up in the portable code,
      but the proposal is not specific enough to address that.
      Perhaps the proposal should be expanded to cover this situation?