[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: CONSTANT-SIDE-EFFECTS (no proposal)
- To: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Subject: Re: Issue: CONSTANT-SIDE-EFFECTS (no proposal)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 26 Oct 88 11:42 PDT
- Cc: KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>'s message of Thu, 20 Oct 88 21:07:35 PDT
While it is certainly possible to address the issue by making "constant" a
first-class run-time accessable property of data, I don't think we are
going to make a lot of progress if we choose that direction.
I think what we need here is a more accurate specification of what actually
is allowed and what is not, even though "constant" is not a first-class
attribute of data.
It is harder to specify, certainly. The specification might require the
introduction of a conceptual construct. There is no need, however, to
require implementations to actually reify the concept in order to make use
of it.