[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: DECLARE-FUNCTION-AMBIGUITY (Version 3)

To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Re: Issue: DECLARE-FUNCTION-AMBIGUITY (Version 3)
From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: 26 Oct 88 16:14 PDT
Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Thu, 13 Oct 88 16:05 EDT

I think we need to make the ballot have the choices:

(DECLARE (TYPE FUNCTION ...)) only
(DECLARE (FTYPE ...)) only
both interpretations, document more carefully


I don't know how to reduce the number of choices easily, do you?

Prev by Date: Re: issue DECLARATION-SCOPE
Next by Date: Re: Issue: ALIST-NIL (Version 4)
Previous by thread: Issue: DECLARE-FUNCTION-AMBIGUITY (Version 3)
Next by thread: Issue: DECLARE-TYPE-FREE (Version 5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread