[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: ALIST-NIL (Version 4)
- To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Issue: ALIST-NIL (Version 4)
- From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 88 12:33:59 PST
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@Sail.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM's message of 26 Oct 88 16:20 PDT <881026-162159-14192@Xerox>
re: One possibility we discussed was to document that an "alist" is in fact a
list of pairs, but to document that the functions ASSOC, RASSOC, ASSOC-IF,
ASSOC-IF-NOT RASSOC-IF and RASSOC-IF-NOT will accept not only an alist but
any list whose elements are either pairs or NIL, and that NIL elements are
ignored. This means that the concept of "alist" is kept to the traditional
interpretation, but that the behavior of some of the functions are
extended.
I rather like this "way out" of the problem.
-- JonL --