[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: HASH-TABLE-PACKAGE-GENERATORS (version 4)
- To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Issue: HASH-TABLE-PACKAGE-GENERATORS (version 4)
- From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 88 16:25:54 PST
- Cc: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM's message of 14 Nov 88 15:32 PST <881114-153301-2381@Xerox>
re: Frankly, although option #2 with filtering looks like it is simpler --
certainly the syntax description is shorter -- I think option #1, where you
spell out more explicitly the kind of iteration you want to do, looks like
it is easier to understand.
So I would vote for option #2 over option #1 even without some special
Lucid-specific circumstances.
You made a typo here -- your "vote" is for option #1. [Not only is this
clear from the context of the remainder of the msg, but I checked it with
Larry, by telephone.] Moon take note.
-- JonL --