[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue DOTTED-MACRO-FORMS
- To: SEB1525@draper.com
- Subject: Re: Issue DOTTED-MACRO-FORMS
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 88 14:19 EST
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: The message of 17 Nov 88 08:22 EST from "Steve Bacher (Batchman)" <SEB1525@draper.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 88 08:22 EST
From: "Steve Bacher (Batchman)" <SEB1525@draper.com>
... Why not be able to say ... (format nil format-text . format-args) ...
People ask for this a lot. It would be fun in the situations where it works,
but it's too error-prone. People like the ability to substitute one expression
for another in an evaluable position. Consider, then, what happens if you
substitute `(cons 'x format-args)' for `format-args' in the above expression:
(format nil format-text . (cons 'x format-args))
>>Error: Unbound variable: CONS