[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 5)
- To: David A. Moon <Moon@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com>
- Subject: Issue: TAILP-NIL (Version 5)
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@Think.COM>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 88 11:25 EST
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu, masinter.pa@xerox.com
- In-reply-to: <19881213015522.7.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 88 20:55 EST
From: David A. Moon <Moon@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com>
Correction: Contrary to what the current practice section says,
the proposal TAILP-NIL:T is not what Symbolics Genera does. In
fact I know of no implementation that does what the proposal says.
However, I support the proposal anyway, because I think it's the
most consistent with the rest of Common Lisp.
I just tried all the examples in the mailing, and they all had the
results that they were supposed to. How does Genera differ from
TAILP-NIL:T?
barmar