[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: COERCE-INCOMPLETE (Version 2)
- To: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Issue: COERCE-INCOMPLETE (Version 2)
- From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 88 00:18:48 PST
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM's message of 9 Dec 88 16:47 PST <881209-164733-1437@Xerox>
Wasn't there some hairy issue with ...-FUNCTION-... in it's name that
we discussed verbally at the June meeting? and didn't we take a vote
there to ammend that issue by saying that
(COERCE '(LAMBDA ...) 'FUNCTION)
would be the way to go from list structure to a "real" function?
That didn't seem to be in your list of obvious candidates for COERCE
extension.
-- JonL --