[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: PACKAGE-CLUTTER (Version 6)
- To: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: Issue: PACKAGE-CLUTTER (Version 6)
- From: rpk@goldhill.com (Robert Krajewski)
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 88 14:55:55 EST
- Cc: x3j13@sail.stanford.edu, masinter.pa@xerox.com
- In-reply-to: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu's message of 12 Dec 88 13:44 PST <881212-134536-5049@Xerox>
I just noticed two problems in this paragraph:
A valid implimentation may have or put additional properties
on symbols (even user created symbols) as long as the
property indicators are not in the LISP, KEYWORD or USER
package.
1. The spelling of the third word.
2. It should be OK for an implementation to use property list indicators
that are *internal* symbols in the LISP package. (Of course, the ``internal''
concept doesn't make sense, really, for keywords, and internal USER symbols
are the most common kind.)