[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue PATHNAME-PRINT-READ, v1
- To: cl-cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Subject: Re: Issue PATHNAME-PRINT-READ, v1
- From: "Steve Bacher (Batchman)" <SEB1525@draper.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 89 07:56 EST
re: Richard Mlynarik's message about #S(PATHNAME ...)
Would this be legal? Does it imply that PATHNAME is implemented as a
DEFSTRUCT? Does the #S(PATHNAME "string" "another-string") syntax conflict
with #S(defstruct-structure :key value ...) syntax, or can it be analogous
to BOA-constructor structures? Whatever the case, I think it's far less
good idea to compromise #S this way than to "use up" #P, which Lucid is
already using anyhow.