[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS (Version 5)

I have read Jeff Dalton's recent discussion as well as JonL's
email, and it is quite possible that I will change my
view as to what the semantics should be stated to be.

I'm not going to vote now for this proposal as it stands --
will think about it harder after X3J13.