Re: Issue: ARRAY-TYPE-ELEMENT-TYPE-SEMANTICS (Version 9)

To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: Re: Issue: ARRAY-TYPE-ELEMENT-TYPE-SEMANTICS (Version 9)
From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: 13 Jan 89 10:17 PST
Cc: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM, jonl@lucid.com, cl-cleanup@Sail.Stanford.Edu
In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>'s message of Fri, 13 Jan 89 00:54 EST

... however, perhaps we should just not require that SUBTYPEP work for
(ARRAY <type>) instead ....