[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

issue IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY, version 5

To: sandra <@cs.utah.edu:sandra@defun>
Subject: issue IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY, version 5
From: jpff%maths.bath.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 89 12:26:26 GMT
Cc: masinter.pa@xerox.com, cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: sandra (Sandra J Loosemore)'s message of Fri, 20 Jan 89 15:35:50 MST <8901202235.AA17390@defun.utah.edu>
Sender: jpff%maths.bath.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK

This is a very good idea.  I have been caught by the two useds of
in-package many times too much.
==Johjn

References:
- issue IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY, version 5
  - From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)

Prev by Date: issue IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY, version 5
Next by Date: Issue: BACKQUOTE-COMMA-ATSIGN-DOT-COMMA (Version 1)
Previous by thread: issue IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY, version 5
Next by thread: issue IN-PACKAGE-FUNCTIONALITY, version 5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread